Current:Home > BackU.S. Regulators Reject Trump’s ‘Multi-Billion-Dollar Bailout’ for Coal Plants-LoTradeCoin
U.S. Regulators Reject Trump’s ‘Multi-Billion-Dollar Bailout’ for Coal Plants
View Date:2025-01-11 18:03:38
ICN delivers essential news on climate change and the energy transformation shaping our world. Don’t miss a story. Subscribe to our newsletter.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on Monday unanimously rejected a Trump administration gambit that would have favored the coal industry by rewarding electric companies for keeping big stockpiles of fuel on hand, supposedly to improve the reliability of power supplies.
The commission, in one of its first significant actions since its membership was fleshed out with President Donald Trump‘s new appointees, said that it would do its own analysis of how the grid is coping and that it had solicited ideas from the nation’s grid operators about how to proceed. The grid operators are the regional authorities who control power supplies, rather than the electric companies or their fuel suppliers.
The idea to bolster the coal and nuclear segments of the complex grid was pushed hard by Energy Secretary Rick Perry last year after extensive lobbying by influential fossil fuel companies, including Murray Coal and First Energy. The plan had been excoriated by diverse interest groups, including many environmental advocates, some public utility companies and natural gas suppliers.
Consumers would have paid billions in higher bills, and most of the benefits would have gone to a few big companies, studies showed.
Neil Chatterjee, a Trump appointee who was the commission’s interim chairman until early December, praised what he called “Secretary Perry’s bold leadership in jump-starting a national conversation on this urgent challenge.”
But another new commissioner, Richard Glick, called the proposal, which also would have affected some nuclear plants, “a multi-billion-dollar bailout” that was not supported by the evidence. He was named to FERC by Trump to a Democratic seat on the politically apportioned commission.
Perry’s Plan Relied on Emergency Powers
The FERC ruling was closely watched even though the action Perry proposed seemed legally frail, relying on emergency powers that are rarely invoked. This time, they were being pushed without any sign of an actual emergency, such as a foreign embargo or a crippling strike, that might have undermined the grid.
As Harvard expert Ari Pesko outlined in this Twitter thread, the proposal didn’t even meet the threshold legal test that FERC had to consider: whether existing rate schedules, known as tariffs, were inherently unjust or unreasonable, and that the new approach would be fairer.
Perry’s theory was that the rates that coal and nuclear utilities were allowed to charge did not reflect all the services they provide to grid stability, and that this was letting renewable energy sources unfairly elbow their way into the marketplace, along with natural gas.
The countervailing view is that a pro-coal thumb on the scales was an anachronism in an energy system that would be better served by market forces.
Unspoken in this debate—and not on Perry’s radar—has been the imperative of making changes to the electric system to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide, the principal greenhouse gas that is warming the planet.
“Energy regulators must follow the law and act on the best available science, and not pick winners and losers based on political alliances,” said Mike Jacobs, senior energy analyst at the Union of Concerned Scientists.
Ask the Grid Operators
In all this, FERC has hardly been a household name, even though its decisions over gas pipelines, electric rates and the like affect consumers all over the country. Its role has been increasingly controversial as advocates of a clean energy revolution have lambasted it for pro-industry leanings, even showing up to protest disruptively at FERC hearings, normally the least theatrical of Washington’s venues.
Environmental groups expressed relief.
“FERC’s decision to ask the regional grid operators how they currently ensure a resilient grid is a reasonable first step,” said John Moore, who runs a “Sustainable FERC” coalition from the Natural Resources Defense Council.
“A well-thought-out inquiry into resilience could help strengthen America’s electric grid. But that will happen only if FERC abandons the Trump administration’s inappropriate focus on aging and unneeded coal and nuclear plants, properly defines resilience and truly investigates how to build a 21st century electricity system,” Moore said.
Uncompetitive Coal vs. Renewables and Gas
Glick was vehement in his criticism of Perry’s plan.
“There is no evidence in the record,” he wrote, “to suggest that temporarily delaying the retirement of uncompetitive coal and nuclear generators would meaningfully improve the resilience of the grid.”
Indeed, he said, the Department of Energy’s own staff study, performed at Perry’s urging, had concluded that the retirement of coal-fired power plants in favor of cheaper, cleaner renewables and natural gas “have not diminished the grid’s reliability or otherwise posed a significant and immediate threat to the resilience of the electric grid.”
“To the contrary, the addition of a diverse array of generation resources, including natural gas, solar, wind, and geothermal, as well as maturing technologies, such as energy storage, distributed generation, and demand response, have in many respects contributed to the resilience of the bulk power system,” he argued.
In a statement, Perry said that “a diverse fuel supply, especially with onsite fuel capability, plays an essential role in providing Americans with reliable, resilient and affordable electricity, particularly in times of weather-related stress like we are seeing now.”
But Glick dismissed that argument, noting that “many coal and nuclear plants with significant on-site fuel supplies have failed to function during extreme weather events because those fuel supplies froze, flooded or were otherwise unavailable. In fact, initial reports indicate that coal-fired facilities accounted for nearly half of all forced outages in PJM during last week’s period of extreme temperatures.”
veryGood! (62197)
Related
- Watch: Military dad's emotional return after a year away
- American Ramble: A writer's walk from D.C. to New York, and through history
- Transcript: Ukrainian ambassador Oksana Markarova on Face the Nation, July 9, 2023
- Restoring Utah National Monument Boundaries Highlights a New Tactic in the Biden Administration’s Climate Strategy
- Homes of Patrick Mahomes, Travis Kelce burglarized, per reports
- Which economic indicator defined 2022?
- California's governor won't appeal parole of Charles Manson follower Leslie Van Houten
- BP and Shell Write-Off Billions in Assets, Citing Covid-19 and Climate Change
- Fighting conspiracy theories with comedy? That’s what the Onion hopes after its purchase of Infowars
- Unsafe streets: The dangers facing pedestrians
Ranking
- A list of mass killings in the United States this year
- Dwyane Wade Weighs In On Debate Over Him and Gabrielle Union Splitting Finances 50/50
- Fortnite maker Epic Games agrees to settle privacy and deception cases
- Vermont Doubles Down on Wood Burning, with Consequences for Climate and Health
- Judge weighs the merits of a lawsuit alleging ‘Real Housewives’ creators abused a cast member
- Kelly Ripa Details the Lengths She and Mark Consuelos Go to For Alone Time
- Unsafe streets: The dangers facing pedestrians
- After the Fukushima disaster, Japan swore to phase out nuclear power. But not anymore
Recommendation
-
When do new 'Yellowstone' episodes come out? Here's the Season 5, Part 2 episode schedule
-
6 killed in small plane crash in Southern California
-
Tired of Wells That Threaten Residents’ Health, a Small California Town Takes on the Oil Industry
-
Rudy Giuliani should be disbarred for false election fraud claims, D.C. review panel says
-
California voters reject proposed ban on forced prison labor in any form
-
For the Sunrise Movement’s D.C. Hub, a Call to Support the Movement for Black Lives
-
A Southern Governor’s Climate and Clean Energy Plan Aims for Zero Emissions
-
Investigation: Many U.S. hospitals sue patients for debts or threaten their credit